Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and GitHub (was: RE: Unit testing support for Eclipse

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, I meant Andrew O.

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Gvozdev
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:05 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and GitHub (was: RE: Unit testing support for Eclipse CDT)

 

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So, Andrew, are saying is that on a fetch (from the github repo in this case to the local repo from which I'll push to eclipse.org after the merge), all the new commit records get updated so that the Committer field is set to the name of the person doing the fetch?

No, I am saying that it does not happen. Currently you can run "git filter-branch" in command line to fix committer in your local repository, then cherry-pick the fixed commits to your local cdt master and push to main cdt repo. I am saying that the need for this flow will be typical at eclipse so egit should streamline that in UI.

 

Andrew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]

> On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:39 AM

> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and GitHub (was: RE: Unit testing support for
> Eclipse CDT)
>

> * Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-08-31 11:33]:
> > At the end if the day, we probably still need to create a patch to
> > attach to the IPzilla.
>
> No you don't.  See:
>
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Handling_Git_Contribution
> s
>
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev