> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re:
[cdt-dev] Including codan feature instead of codan plugins
>
>
>The existing codan feature is a relic of the past. The original
intention was to
> remove it after the 8.0 release.
>
>
Oh, ok.
> Is there a reason why some parts of CDT have features and
others do not?
> gnu.build, gnu.dsf, gnu.gdb are all features but they
are not optional.
> ________________________________________
>
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin [
eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx]
>
Sent: July 26, 2011 10:58 PM
> To: CDT General developers
list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Including codan feature instead of
codan plugins
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Marc
Khouzam
> <
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
wrote:
> > What would be the advantage of having the codan
feature?
>
> There is already a codan feature
(org.eclipse.cdt.codan-feature) which lists all
> the codan
plugins.
> I just thought it would make more sense to include that
feature in the cdt-
> feature, instead of duplicating the list of
plugins in platform-feature.
>
> The existing codan feature is a
relic of the past. The original intention was to
> remove it after the
8.0 release.
>
> -sergey
>
>
________________________________________
> From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
[
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
On
> Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin
> [
eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>]
>
Sent: July 26, 2011 10:28 PM
> To: CDT General developers
list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Including codan feature instead of
codan plugins
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Marc
Khouzam
> <
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx><mailt
>
o:marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at
>
releng/org.eclipse.cdt-feature/feature.xml
> and
>
releng/org.eclipse.cdt.platform-feature/feature.xml
>
>
From what I can see, cdt-feature contains a list of all other features,
while
> platform-feature contains a list of the plugins that don't
have their own
> feature.
>
> So, I was thinking that
instead of putting the Codan plugins in platform-
> feature, we should
put the codan-feature in the cdt-feature.
>
> What would be the
advantage of having the codan feature?
>
> But I'm new to this
stuff.
> Does it make sense?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Marc
>
> -sergey
>
>
_______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing
list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
cdt->
dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing
list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing
list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev_______________________________________________
cdt-dev
mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev