Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Including codan feature instead of codan plugins


On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What would be the advantage of having the codan feature?

There is already a codan feature (org.eclipse.cdt.codan-feature) which lists all the codan plugins.
I just thought it would make more sense to include that feature in the cdt-feature, instead of duplicating
the list of plugins in platform-feature.

The existing codan feature is a relic of the past. The original intention was to remove it after the 8.0 release.

-sergey 

________________________________________
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin [eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: July 26, 2011 10:28 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Including codan feature instead of codan plugins

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi,

I'm looking at
 releng/org.eclipse.cdt-feature/feature.xml
and
 releng/org.eclipse.cdt.platform-feature/feature.xml

>From what I can see, cdt-feature contains a list of all other features, while platform-feature contains a list of the plugins
that don't have their own feature.

So, I was thinking that instead of putting the Codan plugins in platform-feature, we should put the codan-feature
in the cdt-feature.

What would be the advantage of having the codan feature?

But I'm new to this stuff.
Does it make sense?

Thanks

Marc

-sergey

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Back to the top