Re: [cdt-dev] Includes virtual folder

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We should probably add a filter for it then so we can make it optional. I’ll raise a bug for that if there already isn’t one.

Thanks,

Doug

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anderson, Glen
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:02 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Includes virtual folder

 

                I tend to think that it’s one of those things where you won’t really know who uses it until you take it away from them ;) For reference this same topic was discussed a bit about a year ago:

 

                http://markmail.org/message/e4ki52xu6bpqbq2z

 

                My impression of the conversation was that people felt more comfortable with being able to optionally show or hide it vs. yanking it out completely. Personally I wouldn’t mind the CDT defaulting to it being hidden as long as users have the option of turning it back on if they really want to.

 

                Glen

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:59 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] Includes virtual folder

 

Hey gang,

 

Does anyone actually use the Includes virtual folder other than to see whether scanner discovery worked, i.e., use it for actually browsing the includes?

 

Got a request from a customer who wanted to turn it off, and that made me wonder why it’s there in the first place.

 

Thanks,
Doug.