Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Junit tests 
Thanks Mark!  Before removing an assertion, please make sure that the assertion is actually wrong.
In the given case, the assertion is there for a good reason. It's a fact that you cannot use a qualified 
name as a template-name in a template-id. This is dictated by the c++-grammar:
template-id:
	simple-template-id
	operator-function-id < template-argument-listopt >
	literal-operator-id < template-argument-listopt >
simple-template-id:
	template-name < template-argument-listopt >
template-name:
	identifier

Markus.

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc-Andre Laperle
Sent: Samstag, 12. März 2011 21:21
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Junit tests
Importance: Low

I restored the assert and committed a fix.

BTW, removing an assert when a test fails scares me a bit... I suggest next time we take more more time to investigate or at least discuss when it's not Saturday morning and people like me are busy oversleeping ;)

On 11-03-12 10:54 AM, Alena Laskavaia wrote:
> Ok I will remove fist part of assert to make test pass. I tried to 
> pass not qualified name to it - but then test would fail with 
> incorrect result. If you feel strongly that assert should be there 
> please fix the test firt
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Alena Laskavaia 
> <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> Thanks it helps. So it is failing before
>>     public void setTemplateName(IASTName name) {
>>         assertNotFrozen();
>>         assert !(name instanceof ICPPASTQualifiedName)&&  !(name 
>> instanceof ICPPASTTemplateId);
>>
>> name is ICPPASTQualifiedName
>>
>> Why it not suppose to be?
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, James Blackburn 
>> <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 March 2011 15:20, Alena Laskavaia<elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>> Only one test remains failing
>>>>
>>>> https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cdt-nightly/574/testReport/or
>>>> g.eclipse.cdt.ui.tests.refactoring.extractlocalvariable/ExtractLoca
>>>> lVariableRefactoringTest/Bug_331963_Extract_local_variable_doesn_t_
>>>> put_template_type_parameters_Namespace/
>>>>
>>>> I tried to disable it but it does not fail on my host. Does 
>>>> somebody know why it may fail or can reproduce it?
>>> I think to make it fail you'll need to run the JUnit with -ea set on 
>>> your VM (enable asserts).  As to why it fails, I have no idea...
>>> Cheers,
>>> James
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

Back to the top