[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Codan errors
|
- From: Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:01:18 -0500
- Delivered-to: cdt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MyjfEEhLY73ZBuzkpq/TdiP0IHnPMFV0V3eOTg6LjG4=; b=B8AQdhKnwemBWYX5GX0tnYdy2HD0NTNXIoEWkjhKxJVBY8D4YRa1kBgBaGlaaE+/wK W1cV+iXMOBDnhPdFwKttetI+586QfYd5WrS+fA8D33K+Bar6zUV2eCc6qdZXZtdR8rL8 SmoFlgFapnrezrBv44JVzJRYvA2axfqkF9z6M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rJCY03vkavxRZ5JFNt3JlebSzYo641pGGlKqb5RIBlFu50ChUP8WhDfrtvfkLrrhmZ TR8kJQmVeDV9jUMsG6QdfigfJ85AGhnXEbUn/ckoDNV/3fK1VdofZO3J8ptbAbo50sCZ L8slxj/viLc+OMqXa1tV12DJjGNV/6l30SIbc=
Problems only have two types Errors and Warnings (well Info too)
They are different type and maybe I can do different icons in the
editor - but they will be still like error in the views and
decorations
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:21 PM, James Blackburn
<jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There's this bug:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=329430
> It's currently not possible to distinguish between codan errors and compiler
> errors which would be a nice feature to have.
> Cheers,
> James
> On 11 March 2011 17:15, Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>>
>>
>> In my daily usage of Indigo, I often see Codan raising errors in my code
>> even though it compiles fine. This usually happens when I’m doing a
>> complicated project and the indexer hasn’t kept up with what I’m doing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course false errors will shake user’s confidence in the CDT. Should we
>> be making these warnings instead? Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Doug.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>