Re: [cdt-dev] LRParser test failures

[James Blackburn <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 24 January 2011 15:40, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is compounded by the fact that hudson only emails build results to people who recently made checkins. Since the changes that started the failures were made elsewhere, none of us got an email. So, it's not a matter of the parsers not getting any love... it's that we just didn't know there was a problem.

I know that the platform guys email nightly build results to their releng list and seem to make a big effort to track and fix failures.  We should probably do the same in CDT -- filtering them is a simple mail rule away...

Cheers,
James