[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] IP-XACT for register definitions
|
AFAIK, IP-XACT is not being used for this purpose.
ARM (who I believe contributed the IP-XACT plugin) have a defined a new
standard for this, and quite a few tools vendors are now adopting it, and
Semiconductor vendors are producing chip definitions for it. It is called
CMSIS-SVD. If you are interested, you can download the spec from:
http://www.onarm.com/cmsis/download/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Alexiev, Dobrin
> Sent: 09 December 2010 19:58
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] IP-XACT for register definitions
>
> TI's IDE is using proprietary xml files for the registers description
data.
>
> Regards
> Dobrin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Pawel Piech
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:15 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Cc: Christophe.Augier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] IP-XACT for register definitions
>
> Hi Everyone,
> In early DSDP days we had a lot of discussions about standardizing on
IP-XACT
> for register definitions and for other debugger needs. I just got a
question
> internally about whether anyone is using IP-XACT out there?
>
> So is anyone out there in CDT land using it now and if so what's been your
> experience?
>
> Thanks,
> Pawel
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
