On 10/12/2010 01:41 PM, John Cortell wrote:
2. ACPM seems to me a good tool for the client of
an asynchronous
API. However, It's not clear to me that an asynchronous API should
expose
ACPM objects, which I think is what Pawel was hinting at.
Correct, it is what I was getting at. I'm also not clear on how much
value of such change would bring. Personally, I'm not as convinced of
the benefit of the data coherency story, simply because we haven't
really had many data coherency problems in the UI integration use cases
so far. However, I do see a lot of potential value in simplifying the
programming model away from using callbacks as we do now. But even if
we do show that there there is clear advantage to exposing cache
objects in APIs, it may not be enough for existing DSF debuggers to
decide to migrate to this API style. Either way, DSF should be able to
evolve to accommodate this programming model. So I hope that we can
collectively do some prototyping and start answering these questions.
Cheers,
Pawel
John
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|