Re: [cdt-dev] Disassembly View

[Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ehm... yes I guess you're right.  All the disassembly packages are 
internal.  So no major version change is required :-)
-Pawel

On 09/14/2010 05:37 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> Thanks Pawel :). Yes, back to the disassembly view. I'm curious,
> though. What in the disassembly view is API? It appears the API was
> actually in debug.ui to for the CDI/DSF providers.
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Pawel Piech<pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>    
> > Coming back to the disassembly view question.  If we'll move it out into its
> > own plugin, sooner would be better than later since we'd probably need to
> > bump up the major version for DSF as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Pawel
> >
> > On 09/14/2010 11:59 AM, John Cortell wrote:
> >      
> > > Also, not to mention the likely API-breakage such refactoring would
> > > involve.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > At 01:57 PM 9/14/2010, John Cortell wrote:
> > >        
> > > > The idea was to minimize churn. Since DSF was going to be the de-facto
> > > > debugger framework in Helios and is part of the base CDT package, the cost
> > > > and risk of regression in trying to yank it out into some independent
> > > > package was deemed not worth it. If someone had a compelling need for it to
> > > > be, then it could be done post-Helios.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > At 01:49 PM 9/14/2010, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> > > >          
> > > > > Hey gang,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm pretty late to the debugger party, but here I am for better or
> > > > > worse :). I was looking at the CDT debugger view which happens to
> > > > > reside in dsf.ui, but through an number of helpful design decisions is
> > > > > also reused by the CDI debugger. I am now looking at TCF debug and
> > > > > trying to figure out how to hook up a disassembly service, once we get
> > > > > one, up to it. Looks like I can do it, but it does mean that you need
> > > > > the DSF plug-ins even if you aren't using DSF.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sure that must have been a tough decision. Can someone provide me
> > > > > a brief summary. Is this something we want to open up again?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Doug.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > cdt-dev mailing list
> > > > > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > > > >            
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cdt-dev mailing list
> > > > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > > >
> > > >          
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cdt-dev mailing list
> > > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > >        
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> >      
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>