Re: [cdt-dev] actionSet vs. menu/commands/handlers for refactorings

[Martin Schwab <mschwab@xxxxxx>]

Thank you Doug. I've opened a bug here:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=323889

I'll try to create a patch for all menu items.

Thanks,

Martin


Am 28.08.2010 17:36, schrieb Doug Schaefer:
> If there is a reason, I hope it's not a good one.
> 
> I'm on a general rampage to streamline UI, so if you have a patch for
> us to look at and to try out, please file a bug and we'll (or at least
> I) will look at it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Doug
> 
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Martin Schwab <mschwab@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear CDT crew
>>
>> Is there a reason why CDT refactoring menus are hardcoded in
>> CRefactoringActionGroup? It's hard to get a new refactoring in there not
>> touching this code.
>>
>> It seems easy to change the code to use the menus/commands/halders
>> extension points. I've attached a patch that changes the rename
>> refactoring to clarify what I mean. Would the community accept such a
>> change?
>>
>> Background: I'd like to lower the integration barrier for new
>> refactorings because it seems there was much work done in the past and
>> never integrated.