[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] [DSF] FinalLaunchSequence extensibility
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail Khodjaiants
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 2:27 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] FinalLaunchSequence extensibility
>
> On 08/07/2010 2:04 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> > That is interesting. It's like the subSequence solution, with
> > each subSequence being a single step. How would you define the
> > step ids?
> >
> Yes, that's correct. See the Andy Jin's comment regarding granularity.
> I was thinking of the traditional Eclipse style strings:
> <plugin_id>.steps.gdbinit, for instance.
Thinking about it some more, isn't this very much like Vladimir's early
suggestion:
> - Add protected members for each step of FinalLaunchSequence, e.g.:
>
> protected Step getTrackerStep = new Step() { .... } ;
>
> - Add factory methods, e.g.:
>
> protected Step getTrackerStep() { .... }