Re: [cdt-dev] Closing Doc bugs older than 2 years

[<ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1 Good time to clean this up.


> From: ext John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:32:19 +0200
> To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Closing Doc bugs older than 2 years
> 
> Doing so with the comment seems perfectly acceptable to me.
> 
> John
> 
> At 10:14 AM 6/24/2010, Frank.Turovich@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Was trolling through the doc bugs last night and trying to confirm
>> if some were fixed or not but realized that many of them concerned
>> features and options that may have already been addressed but
>> finding old old issues in the latest docs was a bit frustrating. So,
>> would anyone complain if I simply closed all the doc bugs older than
>> 2 years or earlier than 3.4?
>> 
>> I'd include a comment asking people to resubmit the bug if the issue remains.
>> 
>> All comments welcome.
>> 
>> thx // frank
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev