[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cdt-dev] [DSF] timeouts
- From: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:53:28 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AcsSzU3coGNXcBnqQ3yHZ0veTG8zjQADXMDw
- Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] [DSF] timeouts
Yes, I'm starting to be concerned about our lack
of 'timeout' support.
This is a question for DSF in general I believe.
Currently, most calls are asynchronous and are left to
complete whenever they do, if at all.
However, some calls are done within a synchronous DSF
Query, and executed in the UI-thread. If any of those
don't complete, we are in trouble. The Query class
provides with a get(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
which we should probably use in those cases.
Outside those UI-thread cases, I believe we could
still hang a view if a command never complete and
the update.done() is never called. Isn't that the case?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:11 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.; 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] timeouts
> This is a discussion we tabled until after Helios. Maybe now is a
> good time to return to it.
> At 04:53 AM 6/23/2010, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >Does DSF have a mechanism to timeout when a command takes too much
> >time? One case I've run into right now is failure to call done on
> >a request monitor. Another viable case is when a target is stuck
> >for whatever reason. I could not find any provisious for marking
> >an operation failed after a while -- have I missed something?
> >Vladimir Prus
> >(650) 331-3385 x722
> >cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev mailing list