[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cdt-dev] [DSF] Sending random MI commands?
- From: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:47:34 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AcsS1nwFFiziHMbYR36UFsasxWbaZAAA9Rug
- Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] [DSF] Sending random MI commands?
There is a bug about this (which can be applied to MI just as well)
The reason why we didn't commit such a fix was that
we didn't have a good answer for:
"Why do you find
to be cleaner than
new CLICommand(context, command)"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alena Laskavaia
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:17 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] Sending random MI commands?
> We asked same question about CLI command, see
> I think the answer was - it will not be able to parse output...
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Vladimir Prus
> <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It appears that in order to send any new MI command
> whatsoever, I need
> > a new method in the CommandFactory class. Why is that
> required, as opposed
> > to having a backdoor like
> > createRandomMICommand(String name, String arguments)
> > ?
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Vladimir Prus
> > CodeSourcery
> > vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > (650) 331-3385 x722
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> cdt-dev mailing list