> I'd like to see a star for changed files [*] and actual commit message in
> the beginning of comment.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Alena Laskavaia <
elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>>
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=309126
>> How is that?
>> (Same file appear more than one because you did few check-ins of it I
>> think)
>>
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:09 AM, John Cortell <
rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > But even with DSF, often there are additional tweaks that happen after
>> > the
>> > major fix and we sometimes don't bother creating a patch file for them.
>> > A
>> > big +1 from me on this one. It adds clutter to the bug reports, but the
>> > cross-referencing benefits far outweigh the eyesore, IMO. And it removes
>> > the
>> > human elements from the process (oversight, laziness, errors). Not to
>> > mention, it shows what was actually committed, rather than what someone
>> > intends to commit, so it is much more reliable. Patches would still be
>> > necessary for commits that require code reviews.
>> >
>> > What would really help cut down the clutter is if the content was listed
>> > as
>> > follows:
>> >
>> > *** cdt cvs genie ***
>> >
>> > [ ] PerProjectSICollector.java, 1.25
>> > [+] EFSExtensionManager.java, 1.1
>> > [-] FileSystemUtilityManager.java
>> > [ ] ErrorParserManager.java, 1.65
>> >
>> > * Only one [cdt cvs genie] header
>> > * Have a marker indicate the nature of the delta: changed, new, deleted
>> > * Show only the simple file name
>> > * Show the revision
>> > * The file names would be links. You could see the full URL by hovering,
>> > and
>> > go to the diff by clicking it.
>> >
>> > That would make this mechanism perfect in my eyes, but I think it's
>> > worth
>> > having as-is.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > At 06:38 AM 5/27/2010, Alena Laskavaia wrote:
>> >
>> > If you want I can exclude you from the list (i.e if you made change it
>> > won't do it)
>> > Maybe in dsf it is normal to attach a patch but in other projects it
>> > is only done on occasion.
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Schorn, Markus
>> > <
Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> I don't like them, a patch attached to a bug is much more useful.
>> >> Markus.
>> >>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> [ mailto:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alena Laskavaia
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:55 PM
>> >>> To: CDT General developers list.
>> >>> Subject: [cdt-dev] commit auto comment in bugzilla
>> >>> Importance: Low
>> >>>
>> >>> I finished my script that adds comments to bugzilla when
>> >>> commit performed.
>> >>> See example
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291815
>> >>> If you like what it does I will run it in daemon mode.
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev