Re: [cdt-dev] Rename refactoring question

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

I believe that was the logic. I wouldn't mind making that optional somehow, especially if performance is killing the usefulness of the feature.

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Mike Kucera <mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think it does the text search to catch uses of the identifier in inactive code blocks.

Mike Kucera
Java JIT Compiler for System z
IBM Toronto
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx

Sergey Prigogin ---05/17/2010 02:45:44 PM---Does anybody know the rationale for using text search as opposed to index-based one in rename refactoring? The slowness of the

From:	Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
To:	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	05/17/2010 02:45 PM
Subject:	[cdt-dev] Rename refactoring question

---

Does anybody know the rationale for using text search as opposed to index-based one in rename refactoring? The slowness of the test search makes rename refactoring unusable on large projects. See http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=313027 for additional details.

-sergey_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev