[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

IFilesystemUtility interface requires serious work in terms of writing clear unambiguous specifications for all its methods and, possibly, changing method names to match those descriptions. The name of the interface should be more specific. A capitalization mismatch between IFilesystemUtility and FileSystemUtility has to be fixed. A prudent thing to do is to postpone these changes until after 7.0.

-sergey

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well I need some direction on what is the solution.

Do I need to port FilesystemUtilityManager, etc. to 6.0.x as well? Or is it enough for the since tags to be 5.2? Or what exactly?



===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

Inactive hide details for Doug Schaefer ---05/12/2010 11:01:08 AM---Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your comDoug Schaefer ---05/12/2010 11:01:08 AM---Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your commit is clearly in violation of our CDT 7.


From:

Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>

To:

"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

05/12/2010 11:01 AM

Subject:

Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

Sent by:

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your commit is clearly in violation of our CDT 7.0 guidelines and I need to join in the requests to either bring it into alignment or have it withdrawn. We are trying to rid ourselves of the sins of the past. I hope you understand.

Doug.


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


GIF image

GIF image