Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 12:03:58 -0400
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

* Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> [2010-05-12 11:52]:
> Are these Unix groups or some other group mechanism. I tried our committer
> unix group but it didn't like it.

I guess they're not the Unix group.  The committer IDs are pulled from
the Foundation LDAP server.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: Doug Schaefer

References:
- [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: Doug Schaefer
- Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: James Blackburn
- Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: Vivian Kong
- Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: Alena Laskavaia
- Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: Andrew Overholt
- Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: cdt-nightly #140
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs