[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] proposal: remove several CDI debuggers
|
I'll vote for that. And some platform specific logic to not include debuggers that are NOT available on my platform. Like MinGW/MSYS debuggers on OS X. Or the Visual Studio Error Parsers on OS X.
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson
mike.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxBlueQuartz Software
www.bluequartz.netPrincipal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:26 PM, John Cortell
<rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mikhail confirmed in
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=304380
that two of the debuggers available for CDI are redundant and
obsolete (
gdb Debugger and
CygWin gdb Debugger). The list
is quite long and confusing, so removing two of the entries would help a
lot. Anyone have an objection to their removal? If we relocated Doug's
debugger-finding logic to the
gdb/mi debugger, we could even get
rid of a third and actually give the CDI user a sensible, short list of
debugger choices. Sure, we are focusing on DSF-GDB but there's no reason
we can't take a little time and try to make sure those using or adopting
CDI aren't hopelessly confused.
John
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
