[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] DSF/CDI Launchers weirdness
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed.Swartz@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 4:10 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] DSF/CDI Launchers weirdness
>
> Hi,
>
> > We're almost there for that one. And I think we should
> make a decision for 7.0.
> > I'd like some input from the EDC folks; maybe they can make
> their delegate ro Debug only?
>
> Actually, it's a bug at the moment that EDC delegates claim
> to support "run" at all, because we don't actually implement
> it. (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=305958)
>
> So technically, we could drop the "run" modes in our
> delegates and resolve this for the moment.
>
> I tried this out, though, but it's currently even more
> confusing (as a user).
>
> All the C/C++ Local Application launches have a "Debugger"
> tab in them, even for Run mode, and it appears like you need
> to select and configure a GDB debugger in order to proceed,
> though these settings aren't used when running. (I entered
> incorrect settings, for e.g. the gdb path, and the program
> still ran fine.)
I also found this confusing.
I started a thread about it back in February, but it died:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/msg17302.html
But ignoring this point, if you remove your 'run' support
from the delegate, are you able to simply run an app without
getting a prompt?
> (Fortunately, the EDC debugger settings are retained even if
> in Run mode you have selected some random GDB entry.)
>
> Is the Debugger tab really needed or used for the C/C++ Local
> Application run-mode launcher?
>
> -- Ed
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>