[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] common gdb plugin
|
I just come from the days when we had to have a branding plugin (org.eclipse.cdt) which then forces us to go with core and ui for the non-UI and UI bits. And it's what JDT did which is where we got most of our ideas in the early days.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Pawel Piech
<pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unfortunately
naming
conventions don't mention anything about this standard :-(
I personally disliked the extra ".core" string in all the package names
so I left it out.
Cheers,
Pawel
Doug Schaefer wrote:
It's standard almost everywhere else at Eclipse so boo on
EDC and DSF :). But I don't think it matters that much if you're fixed
on naming them as you did.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:59 PM, John Cortell
<rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I considered that, but I think 'the standard' isn't so
standard. It was
not followed by EDC or DSF and I thought I'd follow with their approach
since this is debugger related.
John
At 12:55 PM 4/8/2010, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I'd suggest keeping to our
standard of gdb.core and gdb.ui. The name gdb would be for the branding
plug-in of a feature.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Marc Khouzam
<
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- +1 from me (who knows
nothing about
packaging)
-
- From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
Cortell
- Sent: Thursday, April 08,
2010 11:17 AM
- To: CDT General developers list.; CDT General
developers
list.
- Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] common gdb plugin
- Wanted to send this out before I make the additions to
the
repository, in case someone has an objection or recommendation. I'll be
adding two new plugins:
- org.eclipse.cdt.gdb
- org.eclipse.cdt.gdb.ui
- They are meant to house
code/extensions/extension-points/whatever
that is common between DSF-GDB and DSF-CDI for features and bug-fixes
going forward.
- As for what feature these new plugins will be part
of...that's a
tricky one. The fact that it's gdb-centric makes it inappropriate for
org.eclipse.cdt.platform-feature. And creating a dedicated feature
seems
like overkill. So, I'm going to put it in the the DSF-GDB feature. It's
not ideal, but I don't know that there is an ideal home for these
plugins.
- John
- _______________________________________________
- cdt-dev mailing list
- cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
-
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
