Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question

200 is a guideline. Use your best judgement. Certainly if it's >= 200, you should take a good look at it. Minor tweaks to existing algorithms should be fine. New algorithms are ones we really should be checking.

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:33 PM, John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Never mind. I just got it. Will update wiki...


John

At 05:26 PM 3/16/2010, Andrew Gvozdev wrote:
John,

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:24 PM, John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've updated the wiki.

> Set the iplog as follows:
>  - to '-' if the patch came from a committer
>  - to '+' if the patch came from a non-committer and is >= 200 lines. See also Development_Resources/Automatic_IP_Log

All accepted patches from non-committers of the project need to be marked iplog+. Those that >=200 lines should be additionally submitted for IP review, i.e. CQ in IPZilla and it is currently 250 in http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf.

Andrew



At 02:09 PM 3/16/2010, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I think that meant to say all patches from committers should be iplog-.



_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



Back to the top