Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question

[John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Never mind. I just got it. Will update wiki...

John

At 05:26 PM 3/16/2010, Andrew Gvozdev wrote:

John,

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:24 PM, John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've updated the wiki.

> Set the iplog as follows:
>  - to '-' if the patch came from a committer
>  - to '+' if the patch came from a non-committer and is >= 200 lines. See also Development_Resources/Automatic_IP_Log

All accepted patches from non-committers of the project need to be marked iplog+. Those that >=200 lines should be additionally submitted for IP review, i.e. CQ in IPZilla and it is currently 250 in http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf.

Andrew

At 02:09 PM 3/16/2010, Doug Schaefer wrote:

I think that meant to say all patches from committers should be iplog-.

_______________________________________________

cdt-dev mailing list

cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev