Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question

From: John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:24:52 -0500
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I've updated the wiki.

At 02:09 PM 3/16/2010, Doug Schaefer wrote:

I think that meant to say all patches from committers should be iplog-.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Andrew Gvozdev

References:
- [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Marc Khouzam
- Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Pawel Piech
- RE: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Marc Khouzam
- Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Doug Schaefer
- Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Alena Laskavaia
- Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] A annoying "error" in org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui.memory.traditional.Rendering
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] IPLog question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top