[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDI Deprecation and IGDBJtagDevice
|
I just submitted a bug for this (Bug 305943 --
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=305943). We have some work to
do, and when we've got the code ready we'll submit a patch for review.
Thanks!
-- Steve G.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John Cortell
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:04 PM
To: CDT General developers list.; cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDI Deprecation and IGDBJtagDevice
I'm pretty certain no one is working on that. It would be great if
you'd contribute the serial support. You'd create a patch, we'd
review it. If we asses it as a good solution/approach, we'd adopt it;
perhaps tweak it a bit. If it's a lot of code, we'd have to run it
through an IP check.
John
At 06:26 PM 3/15/2010, Steve Goodrich wrote:
>I was looking at the
>org.eclipse.cdt.debug.gdbjtag.core.jtagdevice.IGDBJtagDevice interface and
>noticed that the methods (getDefaultIpAddress and getDefaultPortNumber) are
>transport-specific. GDB connects via a serial port protocol as well, but
it
>doesn't fit in with the methods. I don't want to duplicate effort if
>someone else is working on this; what's the best way to submit/recommend a
>change here?
>
> -- Steve G.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
