RE: [cdt-dev] target unexpectedly stops on a SIGINT while setting breakp

[Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Doing it Windows only would add complexity. Keeping all comms 
> on the MI channel is a much cleaner approach than this 
> out-of-band interrupt signal to get gdb's attention. Just my 
> opinion, though.
> 
> At the root of everyone's concern seems to be mistrust that 
> gdb will do the right thing. 

Well, to be clear, I'm sure GDB does the right thing :-)
What I'm worried about is if we have to change how we interact
with GDB in async mode.  You know the 'unplanned' stuff.

But I think it is worth a try now that we know there is a good
reason to do it.

I've opened 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=304721

> I hope there are ways we can 
> mitigate that, like bridging the community gap as Dan is doing.
> 
> Doug.
>