Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Reminder: CDT Monthly Call @ Tue Mar 2 11am - 12pm (cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx)

Yup, we actually spend the whole meeting talking about DSF-GDB. I'll be posting my thoughts on build here when I get a chance to write them up later today. I'll post the minutes of the call here too once I get finished with my meetings today, and get some lunch :).

Cheers,
Doug.

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Doug,
I missed the call but I am interested in your update on build. Is there any chance of getting the minutes? Or perhaps you could publish your update here or in bug 296935

Andrew


On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1. You guys have been doing great work on the parity issue. We need to do a check point and decide where to go next.

I'll also update my progress on build. My thinking has been changing over the last couple of weeks as I start to think of autotools, CMake, qmake and such as external managed build systems. I'm thinking that a better approach would be to make it easier to integrate those systems and reuse the external builder, scanner discovery, etc., as opposed to make our managed build system interact with them.

As a part of that, I'm wondering, by providing generic and extensible UI for the New Project Wizard, are we making things horribly complex? For example, should we be adding new project wizards specific to the types of projects users are creating, e.g., the new Qt project wizard, going back to the new Managed and Standard project wizards? What is the desired workflow? I have one eye on ensuring these things are reusable by products and fit nicely into their new project wizard strategy.

Doug.

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
 
I'd like to discuss making DSF-GDB the default debugger integration for CDT.
It is essential to have more people use DSF-GDB if we want to get solid momentum
towards feature development and patch contributions.
 
The feature-parity effort is progressing very well so we need to discuss the next
logical step.
 
Thanks
 
Marc
 
 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: March-01-10 11:15 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Reminder: CDT Monthly Call @ Tue Mar 2 11am - 12pm (cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx)

Reminder of the call tomorrow. If you have any agenda items, please let the people on cdt-dev know.

Thanks,
Doug

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Google Calendar <calendar-notification@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Reminder: CDT Monthly Call @ Tue Mar 2 11am - 12pm (cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx)
To: Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>


CDT Monthly Call

Monthly CDT Call open to all contributors, committers or not.
When
Tue Mar 2 11am – 12pm Eastern Time - Toronto
Where
http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/calls (map)
Calendar
cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx
Who
Doug Schaefer - organizer

Going?   Yes - Maybe - No    more options »

Invitation from Google Calendar

You are receiving this email at the account cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx because you set a reminder for this event on the calendar cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx.

You can change your reminders for specific events in the event details page in https://www.google.com/calendar/.



_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



Back to the top