[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"

Great!!

Let me know if you need help with testing it.

 

Navid

 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 9:07 PM
To: CDT General developers list.; CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"

 

I've been working this week on refactoring the DSF disassembly view to work with both DSF and CDI and I just had my first CDI session where it appears to be mostly working. (Naturally, I got DSF working first)

I'm not going to raise the victory flag just yet, though. I'll update again when I've gotten all the features working. Just wanted to let people know work on it is progressing and looking encouraging.

John

At 08:49 AM 1/14/2010, Mehregani, Navid wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
         boundary="_000_496565EC904933469F292DDA3F1663E602AA311636dlee06enttico_"

We can open a Bugzilla entry after we determine this to be feasible.
Perhaps we can further discuss this in the next CDT monthly meeting.
 
Thanks,
 Navid
 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:53 PM
To: CDT General developers list.; CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
 
There is no bugzilla entry for it but feel free to create one. We can use it to record our results.

I'm hoping we will have it done in time for 7.0. We're still trying to determine the feasibility of it, so I can't say for sure it will happen. But I can tell you someone is actively working on it and that we'll keep everyone posted, whichever way it ends up going.

John


At 04:48 PM 1/13/2010, Mehregani, Navid wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
         boundary="_000_496565EC904933469F292DDA3F1663E602AA31153Cdlee06enttico_"

Hi John,
 
Is this planned for CDT 7.0? Is there a bugzilla entry for it?
 
Thanks,
 Navid


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:19 PM
To: CDT General developers list.; cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
 
We are actively working on retrofitting the DSF Disassemby view to work with CDI, thus making the non-DSF one obsolete. If we are successful, this will address your concern, since there will only be one view.

John

At 04:16 PM 1/13/2010, Mehregani, Navid wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
         boundary="_000_496565EC904933469F292DDA3F1663E602AA31150Cdlee06enttico_"

Hello,
 
Ive used activities to hide CDIs Disassembly view.  Our product is only shipped with DSF Disassembly view.  However, our users dont know or care about DSF.  Im sure most CDT users (not developers) really know what DSF/CDI is.
At first I thought about hiding the DSF Disassembly view via activities and redefining it with a new name, but that doesnt work since DisassemblyView class is in an internal package thats not exported.  I assume the community wouldnt want to export this package?  I obviously dont want to duplicate the code in DisassemblyView and DisassemblyPart. 
 
Does anyone else have this problem? Does it make sense to rename DSF Disassembly to something that would be a bit more meaningful to CDT users? (similar to Memory and Memory Browser views). 
 
Thanks for your help,
 
- Navid
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev