RE: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc

From: Dominique Toupin <dominique.toupin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:57:56 -0500
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcqmBZ9tS5ErKzxBSB+DTLFc7d+ZyQANh23mAAtmFpA=
Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc

Title: Re: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc

Regarding the default launcher issue: I would like to be able to switch it from CDI-GDB to DSF-GDB but as I said I don’t think we are there yet because of feature parity. I hope we can close that gap in CDT 7.0 but we should wait to see what actually gets done and decide closer to release.

- Ken

[Dominique Toupin] Everyone seem to agree we need to switch from CDI-GDB to DSF-GDB, what are the bugs that would prevent the switch?

We can then split them among us and do it before Helios, let's do it! Who can put together the list bugs preventing the switch?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc
  - From: Axel Müller

References:
- Re: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc
  - From: Doug Schaefer
- Re: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc
  - From: ken.ryall

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] CLang self hosts - any plans for CDT/Clang?
Next by Date: [cdt-dev] store permanent information
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] About default debuggers, etc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs