| Re: [cdt-dev] Removing the Full Indexer |
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
11/11/2009 08:52 AM
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] Removing the Full Indexer
While the full indexer parses every header over and over again, it just stores a single version of each header in the index. So where clients depend on the index (e.g. when creating an index based AST), they'll have to rely on that single version of the header.
Clients can always decide to create an AST that does not depend on the index.
Markus.
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:17 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Removing the Full Indexer
Importance: Low
Is the full indexer not still required for accurate refactoring?
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx11/11/2009 08:00 AM
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[cdt-dev] Removing the Full Indexer
Hi,
The full indexer does not provide an advantage over the fast indexer. I
suggest to
remove it (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=294864).
What do you think?
Markus.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
