[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Re: Setting project description confusion
|
- From: Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:07:30 +0100
- Delivered-to: cdt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0+Dj4bw8ika5/n39ignfcofMLs212fXpFnkuD1nT8sI=; b=S+eH1nmO0NlnVZbDnP6BPW5bhbakL5etZo/W6oM9OGtuevTWBUq2b3RkDVI3dkBxWs iG6wBUSTMkblXjvZxfIfESmjtGEA43VKszvORwGUta/ulACSnzyWU6q1w2g/wXyHCb7J aKjHvQLCCPxooy2mvH2sobJqUL1Pwx1xXVJK4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XVmiu01olQgmJiLh+umYtGtx7tqNBNJ8kcPx8GH4bk2s1Dway27pbvPSie3B3XO3X1 +o24dqKd6YCgwx1HDBsYwxyWs0kV85i+Qiecp0XZhcvSIkyW1qmT6tVqdXxwWskfJoXD mZ6v4Kwf6mAbDcKSSQIYOFSJB2pUaaZ+5Fa6c=
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For me the real problem is dealing with all the id's that are used to hook
> things together. If we used real Java inheritance and getters/setters and
> JDT's content assist, it would be a lot easier. The other thing I've run
> into is the need for dynamic toolchain definitions. There are some
> mechanisms in the XML to add in hooks but being all in Java would allow you
> do much more.
Oh yes. I had to do a serious amount of copy'n'paste just to get
-framework added to the standard command line arguments, and that
ended up resulting in a new toolchain being created (which probably
won't work on non-Mac platforms anyway). I'm planning to junk that and
try and inject args dynamically based on a generic setting somewhere
else in the future, but the xml-of-xml-of-xml was error prone at best.
Alex