Re: [cdt-dev] Stupid branching question

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

Uh, yeah. cdt_6_0 is for 6.0 stuff. :).

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rohrbach, Randy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:59 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Stupid branching question
>
> Folks
>
>    Just want to make sure I understand the branching.
>
>    For cdt 6.0.1 we are using the cdt_6_0 branch and just
> checking in to this branch.

Yes, that is what I understood too, and that is what I've been
doing.

>    Of course all edits will be checked in to HEAD as well.

And that too :-)

>    Is this correct.
>
>    Thanks
>
> Randy
>

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev