Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds

It makes sense to rename http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/6.0.100 to http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/6.1 to eliminate a source of confusion.

-sergey

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Vivian Kong <vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

6.0.100 builds: http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/6.0.100/index.html

A build against the HEAD stream will run every Friday morning.



Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

Inactive hide details for Vivian Kong---07/13/2009 01:06:50 PM---Ok I'll update the build script.  I can get a build started to
Vivian Kong---07/13/2009 01:06:50 PM---Ok I'll update the build script. I can get a build started tomorrow as I'm out of town today.


From:

Vivian Kong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA

To:

"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

07/13/2009 01:06 PM

Subject:

Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds

Sent by:

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Ok I'll update the build script. I can get a build started tomorrow as I'm out of town today.

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

Inactive hide details for Doug Schaefer ---07/13/2009 12:05:45 PM---I really don't have a feel for this and probably won't untiDoug Schaefer ---07/13/2009 12:05:45 PM---I really don't have a feel for this and probably won't until we have a plan together. For now, can w

From:

Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>

To:

"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

07/13/2009 12:05 PM

Subject:

Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds

Sent by:

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




I really don't have a feel for this and probably won't until we have a plan together. For now, can we do something clever like call it 6.0.100?


On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Vivian Kong <
vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      We haven't update the build script with the right version number so kicking off a build from HEAD will give you a version 6.0 build. Have we decided on the version number for Helios? If not, what version number can we use in the mean time? 6.1.0 or 7.0?

      Regards,

      Vivian Kong
      IBM Eclipse CDT
      IBM Canada Toronto Lab

      Inactive hide details for Andrew Gvozdev ---07/13/2009 10:11:17 AM---Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself Andrew Gvozdev ---07/13/2009 10:11:17 AM---Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself then? Andrew

      From:

      Andrew Gvozdev <
      angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx>

      To:

      "CDT General developers list." <
      cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Vivian Kong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA

      Date:

      07/13/2009 10:11 AM

      Subject:

      Re: 7.0 builds





      Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself then?

      Andrew

      On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Gvozdev <
      angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
              Hi,
              What is the strategy regarding weekly builds toward Helios? I am interested about somewhat regular builds or more to the point tagging in CVS as we support vendor branch over here.

              Thanks,
              Andrew



      _______________________________________________
      cdt-dev mailing list

      cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top