Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?

Title: Re: [cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?
That is a screw up on my part.
I wasn't supposed to commit it, but the wrong button got pressed
and partial stuff go it.
 
I'll revert now.  Sorry about that


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: June-04-09 12:16 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?

Marc,

+1 I think it should go into CDT 6.0.

Is this partly in now? I just updated from CVS and my build is broken with:

Description    Resource    Path    Location    Type
IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved    GDBControl.java    /org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command    line 414    Java Problem
IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved    GDBControl_7_0.java    /org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command    line 552    Java Problem
The import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved    GDBControl_7_0.java    /org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command    line 33    Java Problem
The import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved    GDBControl.java    /org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command    line 32    Java Problem

- Ken


From: ext Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:00:45 +0200
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?

Hi,

DSF-GDB currently leaves GDB running after the debugged program finishes.
It seems people find this confusing and may give the impression that
DSF-GDB is not behaving well.  I'm afraid it may make some people
think it has bugs and dissuade them from using it.

I wrote a patch to add a preference to control this behavior, and make
the default be the same as CDI (kill GDB when program terminates)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=234468 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=234468>

The preference is a UI change, and there is some minor API changes
(two new methods and an interface file).

I'm looking for some guidance if I should commit this for 6.0 or not.
The main point is that I don’t want to have some behavior that would
turn off people from using DSF-GDB.

Thanks for any opinions.

Marc


Back to the top