Re: [cdt-dev] Coding horror

[Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>]

It depends if exception can be propagated or not. Proper was of logging if not propagated call Activator.getDefault().log(e).
Where Activator is current plugin activator class.

Jesper Eskilson wrote:
> Chris Recoskie wrote:
> > Well looking at the blame annotation, that code was last touched in 2006,
> > and I'm pretty sure that whomever wrote it isn't around any more.
>
> I'm not looking for a scape-goat, but I was a little alarmed at the 
> sheer volume of silently ignored exceptions.
>
> > If this is getting in your way so much, I would suggest you post a patch.
>
> What would be the correct way of handling it? Printing a message on 
> System.err? I tried to find some example on how similar errors are 
> handled, but didn't really find any good ones.