[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Creating tool options programatically
|
Superficially I would say no to that as we have a requirement to use the AST in tools that are not running inside Eclipse. I don't think EMF was designed to be run standalone. I am totally shooting from the hip with that statement though and could be wrong.
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
![Inactive hide details for Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>]()
Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/27/2009 04:24 PM
Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:26 PM, James Blackburn
<jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That all looks very neat, and interesting! The real problem is that I
> don't believe we have anyone with real knowledge of EMF who could
> help drive Managed Build in that direction. There's the perennial
> problem of resourcing: people can justify spending time on tweaking
> code to fix bugs that affect them today, but it's hard to justify a
> paradigm shift.
Speaking of EMF, I think it would also be good to represent ASTs with
EMF models. I was wondering whether it was a good idea to introduce a
runtime dependency on EMF from CDT, but this might be a good time to
revisit that idea.
Alex
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
