Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] minor additons to ICommandLauncher interface

That is a good point. I will look at doing that.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Inactive hide details for "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


          "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

          04/23/2009 04:20 AM


To

Chris Recoskie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc


Subject

RE: [cdt-dev] minor additons to ICommandLauncher interface

Hi,
Because the API allows to implement ICommandLauncher in a future version any addition will be a non-compatible API change. So it would be wise to use an abstract class (where extensions are binary compatible) instead or forbid implementing the interface.

Markus.




From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent:
Monday, April 20, 2009 11:08 PM
To:
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[cdt-dev] minor additons to ICommandLauncher interface
Importance:
Low

I have to make some minor additons to the new ICommandLauncher interface I added for M6 in order to get the RDT remote managed builder working. Since ICommandLauncher is not yet a fully released API, there is no issue with breaking existing clients, but we are past the freeze so I thought I would give folks a heads up.

See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272986 for details.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top