RE: [cdt-dev] git

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

:)

CVS has served us well too. The CVS plug-in still has the best merge
experience relative to the SVN plug-ins. But anyway, indepenedent of
that...

I'm starting to get into git with qemu (which is in the middle of moving
from svn to git), the linux kernel, clutter, etc. As such I'm going to
start using the egit plug-in with CDT to get a sense of how close (or
far) away it is from being usable. That would be a key criterea before
making the move.

And since so many git user projects are C/C++, we need to get involved
to grow the CDT into that community. Has anyone else tried it?

Doug.

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:36 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] git

What is wrong with bugzilla?

Mike Kucera wrote:
> I've always found it ironic how we are building modern 
> state-of-the-art development tools, but we use archaic tools like CVS 
> and bugzilla to do it. I feel that CVS has become completely obsolete.

> I've never used git but from what I hear its very good. If the rest of

> the community is willing to take the lead in making the switch then I
am all for it.
> 
> +1 for git
> 
> Mike Kucera
> Software Developer
> IBM Eclipse CDT Team
> mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Inactive hide details for "Schaefer, Doug" ---04/22/2009 11:46:31 
> AM---BTW, I'm closely tracking the git situation. It is my 
> se"Schaefer, Doug" ---04/22/2009 11:46:31 AM---BTW, I'm closely 
> tracking the git situation. It is my sense that git will help us 
> immensely, even dealing with API changes afte
> 
> 
> From:	
> "Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> To:	
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Date:	
> 04/22/2009 11:46 AM
> 
> Subject:	
> RE: [cdt-dev] git (was:The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 
> 2009)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> 
> 
> BTW, I'm closely tracking the git situation. It is my sense that git 
> will help us immensely, even dealing with API changes after the 
> release as Elena mentions (i.e., do it in your git repo and contribute

> it to the master later).
> 
> So, Chris, I will get you started ;). I'd like to know the CDT 
> community's opinion on this. One thing that Mike challenged us at the 
> council meetings at EclipseCon was for a high profile project to step 
> up and say they would like to move to git before the Foundation would 
> seriously invest in it. Personally, I'd like the CDT to be one of the 
> first. What do you think?
> 
> Doug.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> *From:* cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Chris Recoskie*
> Sent:* Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:57 AM*
> To:* CDT General developers list.*
> Subject:* Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 
> 2009
> 
> I agree, but don't get me started :-P
> 
> ===========================
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> IBM Toronto
> Inactive hide details for Jesper Eskilson 
> <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>
> 
>                                                 *Jesper Eskilson
>
<jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>*
>                                                 Sent by:
>                                                 
> cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>                                                 04/22/2009 03:40 AM
> 
> Please respond to
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 	
> To
> 	
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	
> Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> Chris Recoskie wrote:
> 
>  > My first instinct was to perhaps refactor these packages to use the

> right  > naming convention, but then we lose the CVS history on them 
> all, and this  > affects a lot of classes :-(
> 
> You are using an antiquated version-control tool, you know that,
right?
> The rest of the (open source) world abandoned CVS a long time ago.
> 
> --
> /Jesper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@eclipse.org_
> __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev_
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev