Re: [cdt-dev] git

[Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>]

What is wrong with bugzilla?

Mike Kucera wrote:
> I've always found it ironic how we are building modern state-of-the-art 
> development tools, but we use archaic tools like CVS and bugzilla to do 
> it. I feel that CVS has become completely obsolete. I've never used git 
> but from what I hear its very good. If the rest of the community is 
> willing to take the lead in making the switch then I am all for it.
>
> +1 for git
>
> Mike Kucera
> Software Developer
> IBM Eclipse CDT Team
> mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Inactive hide details for "Schaefer, Doug" ---04/22/2009 11:46:31 
> AM---BTW, I'm closely tracking the git situation. It is my se"Schaefer, 
> Doug" ---04/22/2009 11:46:31 AM---BTW, I'm closely tracking the git 
> situation. It is my sense that git will help us immensely, even dealing 
> with API changes afte
>
>
> From:	
> "Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To:	
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date:	
> 04/22/2009 11:46 AM
>
> Subject:	
> RE: [cdt-dev] git (was:The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> BTW, I'm closely tracking the git situation. It is my sense that git 
> will help us immensely, even dealing with API changes after the release 
> as Elena mentions (i.e., do it in your git repo and contribute it to the 
> master later).
>
> So, Chris, I will get you started ;). I'd like to know the CDT 
> community's opinion on this. One thing that Mike challenged us at the 
> council meetings at EclipseCon was for a high profile project to step up 
> and say they would like to move to git before the Foundation would 
> seriously invest in it. Personally, I'd like the CDT to be one of the 
> first. What do you think?
>
> Doug.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> *On Behalf Of *Chris Recoskie*
> Sent:* Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:57 AM*
> To:* CDT General developers list.*
> Subject:* Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
>
> I agree, but don't get me started :-P
>
> ===========================
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> IBM Toronto
> Inactive hide details for Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>Jesper 
> Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>
>
>                                                 *Jesper Eskilson
>                                                 <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>*
>                                                 Sent by:
>                                                 cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>                                                 04/22/2009 03:40 AM
>
> Please respond to
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 	
> To
> 	
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	
> Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
>
> 	
>
>
> Chris Recoskie wrote:
>
>  > My first instinct was to perhaps refactor these packages to use the right
>  > naming convention, but then we lose the CVS history on them all, and this
>  > affects a lot of classes :-(
>
> You are using an antiquated version-control tool, you know that, right?
> The rest of the (open source) world abandoned CVS a long time ago.
>
> --
> /Jesper
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@eclipse.org_
> __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev_
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev