Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009

From: Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:40:22 +0200
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)

Chris Recoskie wrote:

My first instinct was to perhaps refactor these packages to use the right
naming convention, but then we lose the CVS history on them all, and this
affects a lot of classes :-(

You are using an antiquated version-control tool, you know that, right?The rest of the (open source) world abandoned CVS a long time ago.


--
/Jesper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
  - From: Chris Recoskie

References:
- [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
  - From: Chris Recoskie

Prev by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] Static Analysis Framework for CDT
Next by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] Static Analysis Framework for CDT
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs