[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
|
True. But would you have change the version number for every check-in
then? Since you have no idea when someone is going to do their own
release from CVS? ;)
Again, I'm just trying to be pragmantic with what little resources we
have.
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 11:14 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
>
> We (qnx) are just checking out stuff from CVS so it does not
> really matter.
> Personally I would have changed version of all changed
> plugins, but if it is difficult then it is not big deal.
>
> Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > If you look at the 4.0.3 nightly build page, you'll see 10
> builds were
> > done after the one marked final. Each one of those was done
> on request
> > and incorporated into someone's product. The version number wasn't
> > updated, just the timestamp.
> >
> > I'm just describing what we did for the last couple of
> releases. Feel
> > free to change it, assuming we have the resources to make
> the changes.
> > At the time, we didn't have those resources, and producing
> one wasn't
> > important enough. Does it really matter if everyone has a different
> > version of 5.0.2? There's the ideal that says yes, but
> pragmatically?
> >
> > Doug
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:54 AM
> >> To: CDT General developers list.
> >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>
> >> If we do post 5.0.2 build we have to name them somehow. I
> don't think
> >> we should use 5.0.2 version for that.
> >> So can we change version to 5.0.3 and do just builds on demand,
> >> without official posting or anything?
> >>
> >> Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>> It's quite the overhead to satisfy the marketing guys.
> We'd have to
> >>> post this to the update site and broadcast it on the web
> site. And
> >>> what happens when we do a build a week later. And the week
> >> after that.
> >>> Looking back we had 10 builds after the last official
> 4.0.x release.
> >>>
> >>> Doug.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:42 AM
> >>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>>>
> >>>> It is more for commercial vendors who do CDT based product.
> >>>> It is nice to have "named" version of CDT as a base.
> >>>>
> >>>> Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>>>> What we've done in the past is just continue to do builds
> >>>> past the SR2
> >>>>> release. I don't think we need an official 5.0.3. I'd
> rather the
> >>>>> community start picking up 6.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Doug.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Elena Laskavaia
> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:33 AM
> >>>>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mid April would be good for us too.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Chris Recoskie wrote:
> >>>>>>> I'm going to want a 5.0.3 as well eventually for my fix to
> >>>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268840
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When do people need the official release to be? I'll need
> >>>>>> one sometime
> >>>>>>> in April personally, although we could take a nightly build
> >>>>>> if we had to.
> >>>>>>> ===========================
> >>>>>>> Chris Recoskie
> >>>>>>> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> >>>>>>> IBM Toronto
> >>>>>>> Inactive hide details for Elena Laskavaia
> >>>> <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>Elena
> >>>>>>> Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>*
> >>>>>>> Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 03/17/2009 10:01 AM
> >>>>>>> Please respond to
> >>>>>>> "CDT General developers list."
> >>>>>>> <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> cc
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Subject
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Are we planning 5.0.3? If we do I need to commit some
> stuff too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Andre Bossert wrote:
> >>>>>>> > Is it possible to start the build for CDT 5.0.3 too?
> >>>>>>> > We need the fix for
> >>>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267907
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Regards,
> >>>>>>> > Andre
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> > cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cdt-dev mailing list
> >> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
