[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build

If you look at the 4.0.3 nightly build page, you'll see 10 builds were
done after the one marked final. Each one of those was done on request
and incorporated into someone's product. The version number wasn't
updated, just the timestamp.

I'm just describing what we did for the last couple of releases. Feel
free to change it, assuming we have the resources to make the changes.
At the time, we didn't have those resources, and producing one wasn't
important enough. Does it really matter if everyone has a different
version of 5.0.2? There's the ideal that says yes, but pragmatically?

Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:54 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> 
> If we do post 5.0.2 build we have to name them somehow. I 
> don't think we should use 5.0.2 version for that.
> So can we change version to 5.0.3 and do just builds on 
> demand, without official posting or anything?
> 
> Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > It's quite the overhead to satisfy the marketing guys. We'd have to 
> > post this to the update site and broadcast it on the web site. And 
> > what happens when we do a build a week later. And the week 
> after that.
> > Looking back we had 10 builds after the last official 4.0.x release.
> > 
> > Doug. 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:42 AM
> >> To: CDT General developers list.
> >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>
> >> It is more for commercial vendors who do CDT based product. 
> >> It is nice to have "named" version of CDT as a base.
> >>
> >> Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>> What we've done in the past is just continue to do builds
> >> past the SR2
> >>> release. I don't think we need an official 5.0.3. I'd rather the 
> >>> community start picking up 6.0.
> >>>
> >>> Doug.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elena Laskavaia
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:33 AM
> >>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>>>
> >>>> Mid April would be good for us too.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Chris Recoskie wrote:
> >>>>> I'm going to want a 5.0.3 as well eventually for my fix to 
> >>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268840
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When do people need the official release to be? I'll need
> >>>> one sometime
> >>>>> in April personally, although we could take a nightly build
> >>>> if we had to.
> >>>>> ===========================
> >>>>> Chris Recoskie
> >>>>> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> >>>>> IBM Toronto
> >>>>> Inactive hide details for Elena Laskavaia
> >> <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>Elena
> >>>>> Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                         *Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>*
> >>>>>                         Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                         03/17/2009 10:01 AM
> >>>>>                         Please respond to
> >>>>>                         "CDT General developers list." 
> >>>>> <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To
> >>>>> 	
> >>>>> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> cc
> >>>>> 	
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Subject
> >>>>> 	
> >>>>> Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.3 build
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are we planning 5.0.3? If we do I need to commit some stuff too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andre Bossert wrote:
> >>>>>  > Is it possible to start the build for CDT 5.0.3 too?
> >>>>>  > We need the fix for
> >>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267907
> >>>>>  >
> >>>>>  > Regards,
> >>>>>  > Andre
> >>>>>  >
> >>>>>  > _______________________________________________
> >>>>>  > cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>  > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>  > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cdt-dev mailing list
> >> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>