[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote CDTLaunch"feature into CDT
|
Remote CDT plugin.
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:44 -0800, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> Which part depends on the CDT?
>
> Doug.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anna Dushistova
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:42 PM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Cc: Target Management developer discussions;
> > dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE
> > "Remote CDTLaunch"feature into CDT
> >
> > We are +2, because we depend on CDT right now.
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:32 -0800, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > > I don't think it's that big of deal. Not sure why TM is +2.
> > Ideally,
> > > we should be able to build all of this at the same time.
> > >
> > > Doug.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris
> > > Recoskie
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:22 PM
> > > To: Target Management developer discussions
> > > Cc: Target Management developer discussions; CDT General
> > > developers list.; dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote
> > > CDT Launch"feature into CDT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm.... Yeah... then CDT would have to go from a +1 Galileo
> > > project to a +3? Unless TM decided to move up to +1?
> > >
> > > Sounds messy, at least for right now.
> > >
> > > ===========================
> > > Chris Recoskie
> > > Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> > > IBM Toronto
> > > Inactive hide details for Pawel Piech
> > > <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Pawel Piech
> > > <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > Pawel Piech
> > <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent by:
> > > dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > 03/04/2009 04:05 PM
> > > Please respond to
> > > Target Management developer
> > > discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > >
> > > Target
> > > Management
> > > developer
> > > discussions
> > > <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list."
> > > <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > cc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject
> > >
> > > Re:
> > > [dsdp-tm-dev]
> > > Moving the RSE
> > > "Remote CDT
> > > Launch" feature
> > > into CDT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I like the idea of having the RSE-based remote
> > launch in CDT,
> > > but it would introduce a dependency from CDT on the Target
> > > Management project, which would have implications on the CDT
> > > build.
> > > -Pawel
> > >
> > > Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As some of you may know, one part
> > of the TM /
> > > RSE offering is a "Remote CDT" Launch
> > > configuration, which allows
> > > * Uploading files through
> > > RSE-provided Services
> > > * Launching the
> > program remotely
> > > through an
> > RSE-provided shell
> > > * Debugging remotely through a
> > > remote gdbserver instance
> > > (requires local cross-gdb).
> > > The implementation of this feature requires
> > > using CDT internal non-API [1] in
> > order to get
> > > the debugger configuration page into the
> > > launch config UI, which is forbidden in
> > > Galileo.
> > >
> > > We'd therefore think it makes sense to move
> > > the feature into the CDT [2] -- on the RSE
> > > side, only public API is being
> > used. In other
> > > words, we propose adding a new optional CDT
> > > feature "Remote Launch" which depends on the
> > > RSE, and removing that feature from the RSE
> > > offering.
> > >
> > > The feature itself doesn't expose any API
> > > (everything is "internal"), so renaming the
> > > plugin and/or the package should not be an
> > > issue if that is desired.
> > >
> > > Does the CDT Community agree that this is a
> > > good thing to do?
> > > Who is the right person to get in touch with
> > > for making it happen?
> > > Is it realistic to get that done for M6?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402
> > > [2]
> > >
> > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > > Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
> > > Staff, Wind River
> > > Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC
> > > Member
> > > http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ______________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> > > dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> > > dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cdt-dev mailing list
> > > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > --
> > Dr. Anna Dushistova,
> > MontaVista Software Inc.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
--
Dr. Anna Dushistova,
MontaVista Software Inc.