[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cdt-dev] Anyone working on "Add Include" refactoring?
- From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:26:42 -0800
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1233340005; bh=J9Hx5K9akVLJA2n75wOJ7U0tkUQ=; h=DomainKey-Signature:MIME-Version:Sender:In-Reply-To:References: Date:X-Google-Sender-Auth:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type: X-GMailtapped-By:X-GMailtapped; b=DRw5I+bq9WZCni/tkFI7mh6Bu9xVH2o+ WtKFef+UBno+4t91niuspEK3rw/UuNYAjZu7vLWeBxwSOJRFwAOVvw==
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date: x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type: x-gmailtapped-by:x-gmailtapped; b=a0z4NA9KTiuByRHmJ/RyJ3dHdlPA7lqxkNBDr/M17tphYwZqbq/vMULJOQjjKNw3/ BRQEexJpZ+W8dC4YznaYQ==
There is an existing Add Include command, but it's riddled with problems. See for example 236530
and 255952. I had some ideas regarding Add Include. We can meet to talk about it if you like.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Tom Ball <tball@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm working on a C++ refactoring similar to the "Change Method Signature" one for Java, and belatedly realized that restricting the list of valid types to choose from to those already resolved by the AST makes the refactoring much less useful. Is anyone working on the C++ equivalent of Java's "Add Import" and/or "Organize Imports" refactorings? If not, should I switch over and work on them first?
cdt-dev mailing list