Re: [cdt-dev] ProjectDescription Storage: It should be possibleto exten

[James Blackburn <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Markus,

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Schorn, Markus
<Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> do you have any plans to fix the issue?
> Markus.

I intend to get a patch up for this this weekend -- I was away at the
end of last week & weekend, and haven't had a chance up till now.  Of
course if Chris or you want to fix it before then, that's fine too :)

Cheers,

James


>
> ________________________________
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:52 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] ProjectDescription Storage: It should be possibleto
> extend / override persistence mechanism
> Importance: Low
>
> I had more or less assumed based on past discussions (e.g. at the Summit)
> that we were planning on breaking API to get the build system back to an
> acceptable state. Perhaps I assumed too much.
>
> I should have fixed the API errors though. Seems I forgot to setup my
> baseline again after my hard drive crashed in December. I take
> responsibility for that.
>
> ===========================
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> IBM Toronto
> "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 01/22/2009 04:41 AM
>
> Please respond to
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To
> "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [cdt-dev] ProjectDescription Storage: It should be possible to extend /
> override persistence mechanism
> Hi,
> I have reopend the bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252966
> because the patch
> breaks API in a non-compatible way. For those who use the API-tooling this
> is a big annoyance,
> because you get to see all the errors and it is hard to use the tooling to
> check your own stuff.
>
> Either the breakage needs to be fixed, or the plugin version has to be
> incremented and then the
> breakage has to be documented. (I would actually expect a documentation
> about breaking API plus a
> discussion before the checkin).
>
> Furthermore the patch is large enough, such that the IP Policy requires
> aproval from the Eclipse Member Organisation. We do not have the right to
> violate the Eclipse rules.
>
> Markus.
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>