RE: [cdt-dev] Re: Parsing code under inactive #if or #ifdef

["Liviu Ionescu" <ilgb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> So one of the difficult parts is to find a model that 
> guarantees that we correctly handle the active sections, 
> while providing additional (maybe less accurate) information 
> about the inactive branches. 

regardless the model you choose to handle inactive branches, please don't
forget to consider the impact on the formatter.

I did not perform a thorough check in the current version, but I remember
some of the previous ones had problems to format inactive branches
(sometimes indentation was 'strange', to say the least).
 
regards,

Liviu