More complex would be gdb mi implementation that is currently
developed by DSF guys, this is still much simpler than current
gdb/mi/cdi mess in CDT.
Achim Bursian wrote:
Ah well, maybe I should add, I read all of the thread "Question on
future debugger interface", by Rick Moseley.
So don't simply point me there :-)
Still, all these TCF, DSF, MI etc. acronyms are quite confusing for a
newcomer :-(
I thought it would be as "easy" as launching a dbx process and then
"talking" to that as if I were a human (sending commands, and parsing
the textual results that dbx prints to stdout). Doesn't it work that
way at all?
-Achim
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev