[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cdt-dev] dbx debugger support in CDT
- From: Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:58:05 -0400
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Organization: QNX
- User-agent: Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (X11/20080505)
Yes it does work approximately this way.
If you really starting from the scratch and your debugger is not like
gdb you can start with debug tutorial and small project they used (for
artificial assembly language). Search for debugger tutorial on
More complex would be gdb mi implementation that is currently developed
by DSF guys, this is still much simpler than current gdb/mi/cdi mess in CDT.
Achim Bursian wrote:
Ah well, maybe I should add, I read all of the thread "Question on
future debugger interface", by Rick Moseley.
So don't simply point me there :-)
Still, all these TCF, DSF, MI etc. acronyms are quite confusing for a
I thought it would be as "easy" as launching a dbx process and then
"talking" to that as if I were a human (sending commands, and parsing
the textual results that dbx prints to stdout). Doesn't it work that
way at all?
cdt-dev mailing list