[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Minor bug (?) in make output parsing
|
I'm not sure 100% that this is exactly what you are asking about.
Anyway... If you take a look on the project properties, you'll find
there a bunch of output parser. Most of them are tool specific. Besides
that, this is expandable set, it is possible to add new parser using
appropriate extension point.
.
Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
Well, those of you who watched my earlier mail go by know that I was
having problems getting a proper AST out of a build. It turns out that
it is at least partly a make scanner problem.
All of our compile lines take the form:
/usr/bin/ccache /coyotos/host/bin/i386-unknown-coyotos-gcc ...args...
It seems that the make output scanner doesn't know about ccache, and
therefore cannot parse this. No real surprise, I suppose, since this
usage has to be pretty rare.
I tweaked our makefiles to disable use of CCACHE, and I'm now getting
the AST that I expected.
Should the failure to handle ccache be considered a bug? If so, I'll
file one, and probably supply a patch along with it.
Curiously, now that I have a good AST I still am *not* getting a call
graph that reflects post-preprocessor code, even with full indexing
turned on. A procedure call that is hidden within a macro expansion does
not appear to be visible to the call graph generator. Is this expected,
or is this also something that should be filed as a bug?
shap
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
